codekingpro/portable-devtools
115k
1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>2<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>67.2. Behavior of B-Tree Operator Classes</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets Vsnapshot" /><link rel="prev" href="btree-intro.html" title="67.1. Introduction" /><link rel="next" href="btree-support-funcs.html" title="67.3. B-Tree Support Functions" /></head><body id="docContent" class="container-fluid col-10"><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">67.2. Behavior of B-Tree Operator Classes</th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="btree-intro.html" title="67.1. Introduction">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="btree.html" title="Chapter 67. B-Tree Indexes">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 67. B-Tree Indexes</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 16.3 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="btree-support-funcs.html" title="67.3. B-Tree Support Functions">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="sect1" id="BTREE-BEHAVIOR"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">67.2. Behavior of B-Tree Operator Classes <a href="#BTREE-BEHAVIOR" class="id_link">#</a></h2></div></div></div><p>3 As shown in <a class="xref" href="xindex.html#XINDEX-BTREE-STRAT-TABLE" title="Table 38.3. B-Tree Strategies">Table 38.3</a>, a btree operator4 class must provide five comparison operators,5 <code class="literal"><</code>,6 <code class="literal"><=</code>,7 <code class="literal">=</code>,8 <code class="literal">>=</code> and9 <code class="literal">></code>.10 One might expect that <code class="literal"><></code> should also be part of11 the operator class, but it is not, because it would almost never be12 useful to use a <code class="literal"><></code> WHERE clause in an index13 search. (For some purposes, the planner treats <code class="literal"><></code>14 as associated with a btree operator class; but it finds that operator via15 the <code class="literal">=</code> operator's negator link, rather than16 from <code class="structname">pg_amop</code>.)17 </p><p>18 When several data types share near-identical sorting semantics, their19 operator classes can be grouped into an operator family. Doing so is20 advantageous because it allows the planner to make deductions about21 cross-type comparisons. Each operator class within the family should22 contain the single-type operators (and associated support functions)23 for its input data type, while cross-type comparison operators and24 support functions are <span class="quote">“<span class="quote">loose</span>”</span> in the family. It is25 recommendable that a complete set of cross-type operators be included26 in the family, thus ensuring that the planner can represent any27 comparison conditions that it deduces from transitivity.28 </p><p>29 There are some basic assumptions that a btree operator family must30 satisfy:31 </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: disc; "><li class="listitem"><p>32 An <code class="literal">=</code> operator must be an equivalence relation; that33 is, for all non-null values <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>,34 <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em> of the35 data type:36 37 </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: circle; "><li class="listitem"><p>38 <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>39 <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> is true40 (<em class="firstterm">reflexive law</em>)41 </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>42 if <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>43 <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>,44 then <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>45 <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>46 (<em class="firstterm">symmetric law</em>)47 </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>48 if <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>49 <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> and <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>50 <code class="literal">=</code> <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>,51 then <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal">=</code>52 <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>53 (<em class="firstterm">transitive law</em>)54 </p></li></ul></div><p>55 </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>56 A <code class="literal"><</code> operator must be a strong ordering relation;57 that is, for all non-null values <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>,58 <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>:59 60 </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: circle; "><li class="listitem"><p>61 <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal"><</code>62 <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> is false63 (<em class="firstterm">irreflexive law</em>)64 </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>65 if <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal"><</code>66 <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>67 and <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> <code class="literal"><</code>68 <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>,69 then <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal"><</code>70 <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em>71 (<em class="firstterm">transitive law</em>)72 </p></li></ul></div><p>73 </p></li><li class="listitem"><p>74 Furthermore, the ordering is total; that is, for all non-null75 values <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>:76 77 </p><div class="itemizedlist"><ul class="itemizedlist" style="list-style-type: circle; "><li class="listitem"><p>78 exactly one of <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> <code class="literal"><</code>79 <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>80 <code class="literal">=</code> <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>, and81 <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em> <code class="literal"><</code>82 <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em> is true83 (<em class="firstterm">trichotomy law</em>)84 </p></li></ul></div><p>85 86 (The trichotomy law justifies the definition of the comparison support87 function, of course.)88 </p></li></ul></div><p>89 The other three operators are defined in terms of <code class="literal">=</code>90 and <code class="literal"><</code> in the obvious way, and must act consistently91 with them.92 </p><p>93 For an operator family supporting multiple data types, the above laws must94 hold when <em class="replaceable"><code>A</code></em>, <em class="replaceable"><code>B</code></em>,95 <em class="replaceable"><code>C</code></em> are taken from any data types in the family.96 The transitive laws are the trickiest to ensure, as in cross-type97 situations they represent statements that the behaviors of two or three98 different operators are consistent.99 As an example, it would not work to put <code class="type">float8</code>100 and <code class="type">numeric</code> into the same operator family, at least not with101 the current semantics that <code class="type">numeric</code> values are converted102 to <code class="type">float8</code> for comparison to a <code class="type">float8</code>. Because103 of the limited accuracy of <code class="type">float8</code>, this means there are104 distinct <code class="type">numeric</code> values that will compare equal to the105 same <code class="type">float8</code> value, and thus the transitive law would fail.106 </p><p>107 Another requirement for a multiple-data-type family is that any implicit108 or binary-coercion casts that are defined between data types included in109 the operator family must not change the associated sort ordering.110 </p><p>111 It should be fairly clear why a btree index requires these laws to hold112 within a single data type: without them there is no ordering to arrange113 the keys with. Also, index searches using a comparison key of a114 different data type require comparisons to behave sanely across two115 data types. The extensions to three or more data types within a family116 are not strictly required by the btree index mechanism itself, but the117 planner relies on them for optimization purposes.118 </p></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="btree-intro.html" title="67.1. Introduction">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="btree.html" title="Chapter 67. B-Tree Indexes">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="btree-support-funcs.html" title="67.3. B-Tree Support Functions">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">67.1. Introduction </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 16.3 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> 67.3. B-Tree Support Functions</td></tr></table></div></body></html>