Team Ai
Datasetpublic

codekingpro/portable-devtools

sourceHugging Faceupdated 5mo agoView on Hugging Face
1likes15kdownloads
sql-lock.html170 linesDownload Raw Back to html
1<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>2<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>LOCK</title><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylesheet.css" /><link rev="made" href="pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org" /><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets Vsnapshot" /><link rel="prev" href="sql-load.html" title="LOAD" /><link rel="next" href="sql-merge.html" title="MERGE" /></head><body id="docContent" class="container-fluid col-10"><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="5" align="center">LOCK</th></tr><tr><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="sql-load.html" title="LOAD">Prev</a> </td><td width="10%" align="left"><a accesskey="u" href="sql-commands.html" title="SQL Commands">Up</a></td><th width="60%" align="center">SQL Commands</th><td width="10%" align="right"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 16.3 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="10%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="sql-merge.html" title="MERGE">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="refentry" id="SQL-LOCK"><div class="titlepage"></div><a id="id-1.9.3.155.1" class="indexterm"></a><div class="refnamediv"><h2><span class="refentrytitle">LOCK</span></h2><p>LOCK — lock a table</p></div><div class="refsynopsisdiv"><h2>Synopsis</h2><pre class="synopsis">3LOCK [ TABLE ] [ ONLY ] <em class="replaceable"><code>name</code></em> [ * ] [, ...] [ IN <em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em> MODE ] [ NOWAIT ]4 5<span class="phrase">where <em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em> is one of:</span>6 7    ACCESS SHARE | ROW SHARE | ROW EXCLUSIVE | SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE8    | SHARE | SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE | EXCLUSIVE | ACCESS EXCLUSIVE9</pre></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.155.5"><h2>Description</h2><p>10   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> obtains a table-level lock, waiting11   if necessary for any conflicting locks to be released.  If12   <code class="literal">NOWAIT</code> is specified, <code class="command">LOCK13   TABLE</code> does not wait to acquire the desired lock: if it14   cannot be acquired immediately, the command is aborted and an15   error is emitted.  Once obtained, the lock is held for the16   remainder of the current transaction.  (There is no <code class="command">UNLOCK17   TABLE</code> command; locks are always released at transaction18   end.)19  </p><p>20   When a view is locked, all relations appearing in the view definition21   query are also locked recursively with the same lock mode.22  </p><p>23   When acquiring locks automatically for commands that reference24   tables, <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> always uses the least25   restrictive lock mode possible. <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code>26   provides for cases when you might need more restrictive locking.27   For example, suppose an application runs a transaction at the28   <code class="literal">READ COMMITTED</code> isolation level and needs to ensure that29   data in a table remains stable for the duration of the transaction.30   To achieve this you could obtain <code class="literal">SHARE</code> lock mode over the31   table before querying. This will prevent concurrent data changes32   and ensure subsequent reads of the table see a stable view of33   committed data, because <code class="literal">SHARE</code> lock mode conflicts with34   the <code class="literal">ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> lock acquired by writers, and your35   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE <em class="replaceable"><code>name</code></em> IN SHARE MODE</code>36   statement will wait until any concurrent holders of <code class="literal">ROW37   EXCLUSIVE</code> mode locks commit or roll back. Thus, once you38   obtain the lock, there are no uncommitted writes outstanding;39   furthermore none can begin until you release the lock.40  </p><p>41   To achieve a similar effect when running a transaction at the42   <code class="literal">REPEATABLE READ</code> or <code class="literal">SERIALIZABLE</code>43   isolation level, you have to execute the <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> statement44   before executing any <code class="command">SELECT</code> or data modification statement.45   A <code class="literal">REPEATABLE READ</code> or <code class="literal">SERIALIZABLE</code> transaction's46   view of data will be frozen when its first47   <code class="command">SELECT</code> or data modification statement begins.  A <code class="command">LOCK48   TABLE</code> later in the transaction will still prevent concurrent writes49   — but it won't ensure that what the transaction reads corresponds to50   the latest committed values.51  </p><p>52   If a transaction of this sort is going to change the data in the53   table, then it should use <code class="literal">SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> lock mode54   instead of <code class="literal">SHARE</code> mode.  This ensures that only one55   transaction of this type runs at a time.  Without this, a deadlock56   is possible: two transactions might both acquire <code class="literal">SHARE</code>57   mode, and then be unable to also acquire <code class="literal">ROW EXCLUSIVE</code>58   mode to actually perform their updates.  (Note that a transaction's59   own locks never conflict, so a transaction can acquire <code class="literal">ROW60   EXCLUSIVE</code> mode when it holds <code class="literal">SHARE</code> mode — but not61   if anyone else holds <code class="literal">SHARE</code> mode.)  To avoid deadlocks,62   make sure all transactions acquire locks on the same objects in the63   same order, and if multiple lock modes are involved for a single64   object, then transactions should always acquire the most65   restrictive mode first.66  </p><p>67   More information about the lock modes and locking strategies can be68   found in <a class="xref" href="explicit-locking.html" title="13.3. Explicit Locking">Section 13.3</a>.69  </p></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.155.6"><h2>Parameters</h2><div class="variablelist"><dl class="variablelist"><dt><span class="term"><em class="replaceable"><code>name</code></em></span></dt><dd><p>70      The name (optionally schema-qualified) of an existing table to71      lock. If <code class="literal">ONLY</code> is specified before the table name, only that72      table is locked. If <code class="literal">ONLY</code> is not specified, the table and all73      its descendant tables (if any) are locked.  Optionally, <code class="literal">*</code>74      can be specified after the table name to explicitly indicate that75      descendant tables are included.76     </p><p>77      The command <code class="literal">LOCK TABLE a, b;</code> is equivalent to78      <code class="literal">LOCK TABLE a; LOCK TABLE b;</code>. The tables are locked79      one-by-one in the order specified in the <code class="command">LOCK80      TABLE</code> command.81     </p></dd><dt><span class="term"><em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em></span></dt><dd><p>82      The lock mode specifies which locks this lock conflicts with.83      Lock modes are described in <a class="xref" href="explicit-locking.html" title="13.3. Explicit Locking">Section 13.3</a>.84     </p><p>85      If no lock mode is specified, then <code class="literal">ACCESS86      EXCLUSIVE</code>, the most restrictive mode, is used.87     </p></dd><dt><span class="term"><code class="literal">NOWAIT</code></span></dt><dd><p>88      Specifies that <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> should not wait for89      any conflicting locks to be released: if the specified lock(s)90      cannot be acquired immediately without waiting, the transaction91      is aborted.92     </p></dd></dl></div></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.155.7"><h2>Notes</h2><p>93    To lock a table, the user must have the right privilege for the specified94    <em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em>, or be the table's95    owner or a superuser.  If the user has96    <code class="literal">UPDATE</code>, <code class="literal">DELETE</code>, or97    <code class="literal">TRUNCATE</code> privileges on the table, any <em class="replaceable"><code>lockmode</code></em> is permitted. If the user has98    <code class="literal">INSERT</code> privileges on the table, <code class="literal">ROW EXCLUSIVE99    MODE</code> (or a less-conflicting mode as described in <a class="xref" href="explicit-locking.html" title="13.3. Explicit Locking">Section 13.3</a>) is permitted. If a user has100    <code class="literal">SELECT</code> privileges on the table, <code class="literal">ACCESS SHARE101    MODE</code> is permitted.102   </p><p>103    The user performing the lock on the view must have the corresponding104    privilege on the view.  In addition, by default, the view's owner must105    have the relevant privileges on the underlying base relations, whereas the106    user performing the lock does not need any permissions on the underlying107    base relations.  However, if the view has108    <code class="literal">security_invoker</code> set to <code class="literal">true</code>109    (see <a class="link" href="sql-createview.html" title="CREATE VIEW"><code class="command">CREATE VIEW</code></a>),110    the user performing the lock, rather than the view owner, must have the111    relevant privileges on the underlying base relations.112   </p><p>113    <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> is useless outside a transaction block: the lock114    would remain held only to the completion of the statement.  Therefore115    <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> reports an error if <code class="command">LOCK</code>116    is used outside a transaction block.117    Use118    <a class="link" href="sql-begin.html" title="BEGIN"><code class="command">BEGIN</code></a> and119    <a class="link" href="sql-commit.html" title="COMMIT"><code class="command">COMMIT</code></a>120    (or <a class="link" href="sql-rollback.html" title="ROLLBACK"><code class="command">ROLLBACK</code></a>)121    to define a transaction block.122   </p><p>123   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> only deals with table-level locks, and so124   the mode names involving <code class="literal">ROW</code> are all misnomers.  These125   mode names should generally be read as indicating the intention of126   the user to acquire row-level locks within the locked table.  Also,127   <code class="literal">ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> mode is a shareable table lock.  Keep in128   mind that all the lock modes have identical semantics so far as129   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> is concerned, differing only in the rules130   about which modes conflict with which. For information on how to131   acquire an actual row-level lock, see <a class="xref" href="explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS" title="13.3.2. Row-Level Locks">Section 13.3.2</a>132   and <a class="xref" href="sql-select.html#SQL-FOR-UPDATE-SHARE" title="The Locking Clause">The Locking Clause</a>133   in the <a class="xref" href="sql-select.html" title="SELECT"><span class="refentrytitle">SELECT</span></a> documentation.134  </p></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.155.8"><h2>Examples</h2><p>135   Obtain a <code class="literal">SHARE</code> lock on a primary key table when going to perform136   inserts into a foreign key table:137 138</p><pre class="programlisting">139BEGIN WORK;140LOCK TABLE films IN SHARE MODE;141SELECT id FROM films142    WHERE name = 'Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace';143-- Do ROLLBACK if record was not returned144INSERT INTO films_user_comments VALUES145    (_id_, 'GREAT! I was waiting for it for so long!');146COMMIT WORK;147</pre><p>148  </p><p>149   Take a <code class="literal">SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE</code> lock on a primary key table when going to perform150   a delete operation:151 152</p><pre class="programlisting">153BEGIN WORK;154LOCK TABLE films IN SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE;155DELETE FROM films_user_comments WHERE id IN156    (SELECT id FROM films WHERE rating &lt; 5);157DELETE FROM films WHERE rating &lt; 5;158COMMIT WORK;159</pre></div><div class="refsect1" id="id-1.9.3.155.9"><h2>Compatibility</h2><p>160   There is no <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> in the SQL standard,161   which instead uses <code class="command">SET TRANSACTION</code> to specify162   concurrency levels on transactions.  <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> supports that too;163   see <a class="xref" href="sql-set-transaction.html" title="SET TRANSACTION"><span class="refentrytitle">SET TRANSACTION</span></a> for details.164  </p><p>165   Except for <code class="literal">ACCESS SHARE</code>, <code class="literal">ACCESS EXCLUSIVE</code>,166   and <code class="literal">SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE</code> lock modes, the167   <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> lock modes and the168   <code class="command">LOCK TABLE</code> syntax are compatible with those169   present in <span class="productname">Oracle</span>.170  </p></div></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="sql-load.html" title="LOAD">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="sql-commands.html" title="SQL Commands">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="sql-merge.html" title="MERGE">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">LOAD </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 16.3 Documentation">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> MERGE</td></tr></table></div></body></html>
codekingpro/portable-devtools · Team Ai