codekingpro/portable-devtools
114k
1#2# distutils/version.py3#4# Implements multiple version numbering conventions for the5# Python Module Distribution Utilities.6#7# $Id$8#9 10"""Provides classes to represent module version numbers (one class for11each style of version numbering). There are currently two such classes12implemented: StrictVersion and LooseVersion.13 14Every version number class implements the following interface:15 * the 'parse' method takes a string and parses it to some internal16 representation; if the string is an invalid version number,17 'parse' raises a ValueError exception18 * the class constructor takes an optional string argument which,19 if supplied, is passed to 'parse'20 * __str__ reconstructs the string that was passed to 'parse' (or21 an equivalent string -- ie. one that will generate an equivalent22 version number instance)23 * __repr__ generates Python code to recreate the version number instance24 * _cmp compares the current instance with either another instance25 of the same class or a string (which will be parsed to an instance26 of the same class, thus must follow the same rules)27"""28 29import contextlib30import re31import warnings32 33 34@contextlib.contextmanager35def suppress_known_deprecation():36 with warnings.catch_warnings(record=True) as ctx:37 warnings.filterwarnings(38 action='default',39 category=DeprecationWarning,40 message="distutils Version classes are deprecated.",41 )42 yield ctx43 44 45class Version:46 """Abstract base class for version numbering classes. Just provides47 constructor (__init__) and reproducer (__repr__), because those48 seem to be the same for all version numbering classes; and route49 rich comparisons to _cmp.50 """51 52 def __init__(self, vstring=None):53 if vstring:54 self.parse(vstring)55 warnings.warn(56 "distutils Version classes are deprecated. "57 "Use packaging.version instead.",58 DeprecationWarning,59 stacklevel=2,60 )61 62 def __repr__(self):63 return f"{self.__class__.__name__} ('{str(self)}')"64 65 def __eq__(self, other):66 c = self._cmp(other)67 if c is NotImplemented:68 return c69 return c == 070 71 def __lt__(self, other):72 c = self._cmp(other)73 if c is NotImplemented:74 return c75 return c < 076 77 def __le__(self, other):78 c = self._cmp(other)79 if c is NotImplemented:80 return c81 return c <= 082 83 def __gt__(self, other):84 c = self._cmp(other)85 if c is NotImplemented:86 return c87 return c > 088 89 def __ge__(self, other):90 c = self._cmp(other)91 if c is NotImplemented:92 return c93 return c >= 094 95 96# Interface for version-number classes -- must be implemented97# by the following classes (the concrete ones -- Version should98# be treated as an abstract class).99# __init__ (string) - create and take same action as 'parse'100# (string parameter is optional)101# parse (string) - convert a string representation to whatever102# internal representation is appropriate for103# this style of version numbering104# __str__ (self) - convert back to a string; should be very similar105# (if not identical to) the string supplied to parse106# __repr__ (self) - generate Python code to recreate107# the instance108# _cmp (self, other) - compare two version numbers ('other' may109# be an unparsed version string, or another110# instance of your version class)111 112 113class StrictVersion(Version):114 """Version numbering for anal retentives and software idealists.115 Implements the standard interface for version number classes as116 described above. A version number consists of two or three117 dot-separated numeric components, with an optional "pre-release" tag118 on the end. The pre-release tag consists of the letter 'a' or 'b'119 followed by a number. If the numeric components of two version120 numbers are equal, then one with a pre-release tag will always121 be deemed earlier (lesser) than one without.122 123 The following are valid version numbers (shown in the order that124 would be obtained by sorting according to the supplied cmp function):125 126 0.4 0.4.0 (these two are equivalent)127 0.4.1128 0.5a1129 0.5b3130 0.5131 0.9.6132 1.0133 1.0.4a3134 1.0.4b1135 1.0.4136 137 The following are examples of invalid version numbers:138 139 1140 2.7.2.2141 1.3.a4142 1.3pl1143 1.3c4144 145 The rationale for this version numbering system will be explained146 in the distutils documentation.147 """148 149 version_re = re.compile(150 r'^(\d+) \. (\d+) (\. (\d+))? ([ab](\d+))?$', re.VERBOSE | re.ASCII151 )152 153 def parse(self, vstring):154 match = self.version_re.match(vstring)155 if not match:156 raise ValueError("invalid version number '%s'" % vstring)157 158 (major, minor, patch, prerelease, prerelease_num) = match.group(1, 2, 4, 5, 6)159 160 if patch:161 self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor, patch]))162 else:163 self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor])) + (0,)164 165 if prerelease:166 self.prerelease = (prerelease[0], int(prerelease_num))167 else:168 self.prerelease = None169 170 def __str__(self):171 if self.version[2] == 0:172 vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version[0:2]))173 else:174 vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version))175 176 if self.prerelease:177 vstring = vstring + self.prerelease[0] + str(self.prerelease[1])178 179 return vstring180 181 def _cmp(self, other):182 if isinstance(other, str):183 with suppress_known_deprecation():184 other = StrictVersion(other)185 elif not isinstance(other, StrictVersion):186 return NotImplemented187 188 if self.version == other.version:189 # versions match; pre-release drives the comparison190 return self._cmp_prerelease(other)191 192 return -1 if self.version < other.version else 1193 194 def _cmp_prerelease(self, other):195 """196 case 1: self has prerelease, other doesn't; other is greater197 case 2: self doesn't have prerelease, other does: self is greater198 case 3: both or neither have prerelease: compare them!199 """200 if self.prerelease and not other.prerelease:201 return -1202 elif not self.prerelease and other.prerelease:203 return 1204 205 if self.prerelease == other.prerelease:206 return 0207 elif self.prerelease < other.prerelease:208 return -1209 else:210 return 1211 212 213# end class StrictVersion214 215 216# The rules according to Greg Stein:217# 1) a version number has 1 or more numbers separated by a period or by218# sequences of letters. If only periods, then these are compared219# left-to-right to determine an ordering.220# 2) sequences of letters are part of the tuple for comparison and are221# compared lexicographically222# 3) recognize the numeric components may have leading zeroes223#224# The LooseVersion class below implements these rules: a version number225# string is split up into a tuple of integer and string components, and226# comparison is a simple tuple comparison. This means that version227# numbers behave in a predictable and obvious way, but a way that might228# not necessarily be how people *want* version numbers to behave. There229# wouldn't be a problem if people could stick to purely numeric version230# numbers: just split on period and compare the numbers as tuples.231# However, people insist on putting letters into their version numbers;232# the most common purpose seems to be:233# - indicating a "pre-release" version234# ('alpha', 'beta', 'a', 'b', 'pre', 'p')235# - indicating a post-release patch ('p', 'pl', 'patch')236# but of course this can't cover all version number schemes, and there's237# no way to know what a programmer means without asking him.238#239# The problem is what to do with letters (and other non-numeric240# characters) in a version number. The current implementation does the241# obvious and predictable thing: keep them as strings and compare242# lexically within a tuple comparison. This has the desired effect if243# an appended letter sequence implies something "post-release":244# eg. "0.99" < "0.99pl14" < "1.0", and "5.001" < "5.001m" < "5.002".245#246# However, if letters in a version number imply a pre-release version,247# the "obvious" thing isn't correct. Eg. you would expect that248# "1.5.1" < "1.5.2a2" < "1.5.2", but under the tuple/lexical comparison249# implemented here, this just isn't so.250#251# Two possible solutions come to mind. The first is to tie the252# comparison algorithm to a particular set of semantic rules, as has253# been done in the StrictVersion class above. This works great as long254# as everyone can go along with bondage and discipline. Hopefully a255# (large) subset of Python module programmers will agree that the256# particular flavour of bondage and discipline provided by StrictVersion257# provides enough benefit to be worth using, and will submit their258# version numbering scheme to its domination. The free-thinking259# anarchists in the lot will never give in, though, and something needs260# to be done to accommodate them.261#262# Perhaps a "moderately strict" version class could be implemented that263# lets almost anything slide (syntactically), and makes some heuristic264# assumptions about non-digits in version number strings. This could265# sink into special-case-hell, though; if I was as talented and266# idiosyncratic as Larry Wall, I'd go ahead and implement a class that267# somehow knows that "1.2.1" < "1.2.2a2" < "1.2.2" < "1.2.2pl3", and is268# just as happy dealing with things like "2g6" and "1.13++". I don't269# think I'm smart enough to do it right though.270#271# In any case, I've coded the test suite for this module (see272# ../test/test_version.py) specifically to fail on things like comparing273# "1.2a2" and "1.2". That's not because the *code* is doing anything274# wrong, it's because the simple, obvious design doesn't match my275# complicated, hairy expectations for real-world version numbers. It276# would be a snap to fix the test suite to say, "Yep, LooseVersion does277# the Right Thing" (ie. the code matches the conception). But I'd rather278# have a conception that matches common notions about version numbers.279 280 281class LooseVersion(Version):282 """Version numbering for anarchists and software realists.283 Implements the standard interface for version number classes as284 described above. A version number consists of a series of numbers,285 separated by either periods or strings of letters. When comparing286 version numbers, the numeric components will be compared287 numerically, and the alphabetic components lexically. The following288 are all valid version numbers, in no particular order:289 290 1.5.1291 1.5.2b2292 161293 3.10a294 8.02295 3.4j296 1996.07.12297 3.2.pl0298 3.1.1.6299 2g6300 11g301 0.960923302 2.2beta29303 1.13++304 5.5.kw305 2.0b1pl0306 307 In fact, there is no such thing as an invalid version number under308 this scheme; the rules for comparison are simple and predictable,309 but may not always give the results you want (for some definition310 of "want").311 """312 313 component_re = re.compile(r'(\d+ | [a-z]+ | \.)', re.VERBOSE)314 315 def parse(self, vstring):316 # I've given up on thinking I can reconstruct the version string317 # from the parsed tuple -- so I just store the string here for318 # use by __str__319 self.vstring = vstring320 components = [x for x in self.component_re.split(vstring) if x and x != '.']321 for i, obj in enumerate(components):322 try:323 components[i] = int(obj)324 except ValueError:325 pass326 327 self.version = components328 329 def __str__(self):330 return self.vstring331 332 def __repr__(self):333 return "LooseVersion ('%s')" % str(self)334 335 def _cmp(self, other):336 if isinstance(other, str):337 other = LooseVersion(other)338 elif not isinstance(other, LooseVersion):339 return NotImplemented340 341 if self.version == other.version:342 return 0343 if self.version < other.version:344 return -1345 if self.version > other.version:346 return 1347 348 349# end class LooseVersion350 