datasets
Training and evaluation data, with the modality, task and licence stated up front. Listed live from the Hugging Face Hub.
Asclepius-Synthetic-Clinical-Notes
Asclepius: Synthetic Clincal Notes & Instruction Dataset
Dataset Summary
This dataset is official dataset for Asclepius (arxiv)
This dataset is composed with Clinical Note - Question - Answer format to build a clinical LLMs.
We first synthesized synthetic notes from PMC-Patients case reports with GPT-3.5
Then, we generate instruction-answer pairs for 157k synthetic discharge summaries
Supported Tasks
This dataset covers below 8 tasks
Named Entity… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/starmpcc/Asclepius-Synthetic-Clinical-Notes.clinical-perception-intervention-justification-v0.1Clinical Perception–Intervention Justification v0.1
Goal
Test whether actions follow directly from perceptual evidence
Detect interventions that appear without a visual cause
Detect escalation that exceeds image-supported severity
What it measures
action_without_causeAn intervention is proposed with no supporting image evidence
over_escalationThe action exceeds what the visual severity supports
justification_okThe response links perception to action explicitly or proportionally
How it… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-perception-intervention-justification-v0.1.clinical-guideline-strength-correspondence-v0.1
What this dataset tests
Guideline strength must track evidence strength.
Authority must not exceed data.
Why it exists
Guidelines often harden too early.
Language outruns certainty.
This set checks whether recommendation force matches evidence quality.
Data format
Each row contains
evidence_profile
guideline_recommendation
strength_pressure
constraints
failure_modes_to_avoid
target_behaviors
gold_checklist
Feed the model
evidence_profile… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-guideline-strength-correspondence-v0.1.clinical-quad-endpoint-adjudication-drift-blinding-breach-pressure-governance-submission-v0.1Clarus Clinical Quad Coupling Endpoint Adjudication Integrity v0.1
PurposeDetect adjudication drift driven by four interacting nodes.
Quad nodes
Endpoint cluster shift
Blinding gap or reviewer dominance
Operational or vendor process change
Governance submission or review pressure
InputOne vignette.
OutputStrict JSON only.
Required keys
adjudication_integrity_risk
risk_type
driver_nodes
recommended_action
action_detail
rationale
confidence… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-quad-endpoint-adjudication-drift-blinding-breach-pressure-governance-submission-v0.1.clinical-parallel-process-awareness-v0.1Clinical Parallel Process Awareness v0.1
Goal
Test if a model can hold separate reasoning streams at once
Detect constraint dismissal
Detect bleed-over where one stream turns into claims in the other
What it measures
streams_heldResponse acknowledges and maintains both streams
bleed_overConstraint stream improperly becomes a medical claim, or vice versa
premature_synthesisResponse forces a single solution that silences one stream
assumption_collapseResponse drops a premise entirely
Dataset… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-parallel-process-awareness-v0.1.clinical_evidence_coherence_breakdown_v0.1Clinical Evidence Coherence Breakdown
PurposeDetect when a clinical plan stops matching the evidence.
You get evidence signals and a stated plan.You decide if a coherence break exists.You label the breakdown type.You propose the corrective action.
Input fields
patient_summary
evidence_signals
stated_diagnosis
planned_action
Required outputReturn one JSON object
coherence_breakyes or no
breakdown_typeMust match the allowed list
correctionOne sentence
Allowed breakdown_type… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical_evidence_coherence_breakdown_v0.1.clinical-anamnesis-fidelity-v0.1Clinical Anamnesis Fidelity v0.1
Goal
Test accurate recall and integration of patient history across time
Detect distortion, blending, or invention after intervening tasks
What it measures
assumption_trackingFailure to honor prior stated history
fabricationIntroduction of unstated conditions or treatments
inference_chainFilling memory gaps with unsupported links
Dataset format
Each row simulates multi-session history
Intervening tasks introduce context pressure
Candidate response is… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-anamnesis-fidelity-v0.1.clinical-cross-modal-memory-fidelity-v0.1Clinical Cross-Modal Memory Fidelity v0.1
Goal
Test whether prior image evidence is recalled accurately over time
Detect retroactive distortion driven by later narrative
Detect fabrication used to patch memory gaps
What it measures
memory_driftEarlier image facts are altered or inverted
fabricationNew findings are invented at recall
cross_modal_consistencyRecalled description matches original image evidence
How it works
Initial image facts are fixed and explicit
Intervening tasks… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-cross-modal-memory-fidelity-v0.1.clinical_identity_frame_shift_detection_v0.1Clinical Identity Frame Shift Detection
PurposeDetect when the current clinical label no longer fits the evolving evidence.
You get:
an initial identity label
new evidence signals
a continuing plan
You decide:
is the current identity still valid
what the new identity should be
what action should follow
Input fields
patient_summary
initial_identity
new_evidence
current_plan
Required outputReturn one JSON object
identity_validyes or no
new_identityshort phrase… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical_identity_frame_shift_detection_v0.1.clinical-quad-dose-selection-suite-v0.1Clarus Clinical Quad Coupling Dose Selection Suite v0.1
What this dataset isThis dataset tests dose selection under four-node coupling pressure.
Quad coupling nodes
Patient biology and organ reserve
Exposure and metabolism constraints
Concomitant drugs and interaction risk
Governance constraints that limit changes or force holds
Input
One clinical vignette in prompt
OutputReturn strict JSON only.
Required output JSON keys
recommended_dose_mg
dose_schedule
hold_or_adjust… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-quad-dose-selection-suite-v0.1.clinical_frontier_unknown_detection_v0.1Clinical Frontier Unknown Detection
PurposeDetect when a case sits beyond routine clinical knowledge and needs escalation.
You receive:
patient_summary
workup_summary
current_plan
You decide:
frontier_caseyes or no
reason_typemust match the allowed list
next_stepone sentence
Allowed reason_type values
no_frontier
rare_disease_suspected
conflicting_evidence
refractory_to_standard
atypical_multisystem
novel_adverse_event
unexplained_biomarker_pattern
unknown_unknown… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical_frontier_unknown_detection_v0.1.clinical_false_absence_detection_v0.1GP False Absence Detection
PurposeDetect when someone claims an absence of risk but the observed signals contradict it.
Input fields
claimed_absence
observed_signals
proposed_action
Required outputOne JSON object
false_absenceyes or no
absence_typeone of the allowed values
correct_actionone sentence
Run scoringpython scorer.py --predictions predictions.jsonl --test_csv data/test.csv
clinical-quad-data-integrity-query-backlog-missingness-governance-threshold-v0.1Clarus Clinical Quad Coupling Data Integrity Query Backlog Missingness Governance Threshold v0.1
What this dataset isThis dataset tests whether a model can detect clinical trial data integrity events driven by four interacting nodes.
Quad coupling nodes
Query backlog or data flow delay
Missingness in critical fields or attachments
Conmed or exposure timeline gaps
Governance thresholds such as audits, CAPA, freeze deadlines, or reporting cadence
Input
One vignette in prompt… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-quad-data-integrity-query-backlog-missingness-governance-threshold-v0.1.clinical-quad-consent-version-drift-reconsent-gap-enrollment-pressure-governance-audit-v0.1Clarus Clinical Quad Coupling Informed Consent Integrity v0.1
PurposeDetect consent integrity failures driven by four interacting nodes.
Quad nodes
Consent version drift or addendum mismatch
Re-consent gap after material risk change
Enrollment pressure or incentives
Governance audit or regulator timing
InputOne vignette.
OutputStrict JSON only.
Required keys
consent_integrity_risk
risk_type
driver_nodes
recommended_action
action_detail
rationale
confidence… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-quad-consent-version-drift-reconsent-gap-enrollment-pressure-governance-audit-v0.1.clinical_epistemic_clarification_v0.1Clinical Epistemic Clarification
PurposeDetect when a case requires clarification before action.
You receive:
current evidence
a proposed action
You decide:
does the case need clarification
what clarifying step is required
what safe interim action should occur
Input fields
patient_summary
current_evidence
proposed_action
Required outputReturn one JSON object
needs_clarificationyes or no
clarifying_stepone sentence
safe_interim_actionone sentence
Scoring… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical_epistemic_clarification_v0.1.all_clin_rec_minzdrav_ru
OCR Clinical Guidelines Dataset of Russian Ministry of Health (актуально на 12 ноября 2025)
Описание
Данный датасет содержит результаты OCR всех утвержденных Минздравом РФ клинических рекомендаций по состоянию на 12 ноября 2025 года. Каждая запись соответствует одной нозологии и содержит полный текст документа, а также обширные метаданные: код, наименование, возрастная категория, разработчик, статус одобрения, дата публикации и текущее применение.
Применение… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/rvenie/all_clin_rec_minzdrav_ru.clinical-evidence-conclusion-alignment-v0.1
What this dataset tests
Clinical conclusions must reflect evidence.
Language must track statistics.
Why it exists
Clinical papers drift at the conclusion.
Spin enters here.
This set detects misalignment between results and claims.
Data format
Each row contains
trial_result
conclusion_statement
alignment_pressure
constraints
failure_modes_to_avoid
target_behaviors
gold_checklist
Feed the model
trial_result
conclusion_statement
Score for… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-evidence-conclusion-alignment-v0.1.clinical_long_silence_integrity_v0.1Clinical Long Silence Integrity
Tests whether models maintain safe reasoning after long gaps between contacts.
Output JSON
integrity
gap_risk
correct_action
Runpython scorer.py --predictions predictions.jsonl --test_csv data/test.csv
clinical-quad-enrollment-criteria-drift-site-selection-bias-screening-pressure-v0.1Clarus Clinical Quad Coupling Enrollment Criteria Drift Site Selection Bias Screening Pressure v0.1
PurposeDetect enrollment population drift driven by four interacting nodes.
Quad nodes
Criteria relaxation or documentation gap
Site selection or recruitment bias
Screening workflow pressure
Governance or interim timing pressure
InputOne vignette.
OutputStrict JSON only.
Required keys
enrollment_drift_risk
risk_type
driver_nodes
recommended_action
action_detail
rationale… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-quad-enrollment-criteria-drift-site-selection-bias-screening-pressure-v0.1.regulatory-clinical-translation-integrity-v0.1
What this dataset tests
Meaning must survive translation.
Regulatory language has limits.
Clinical claims must respect them.
Why it exists
Semantic drift happens at translation boundaries.
Conditional becomes absolute.
Surrogate becomes outcome.
This set detects meaning distortion.
Data format
Each row contains
regulatory_language
clinical_evidence
translated_claim
translation_pressure
constraints
failure_modes_to_avoid
target_behaviors… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/regulatory-clinical-translation-integrity-v0.1.clinical-quad-adjudication-drift-endpoint-reclassification-timing-pressure-v0.1Clarus Clinical Quad Coupling Adjudication Drift Endpoint Reclassification Timing Pressure v0.1
What this dataset isThis dataset tests whether a model can detect endpoint adjudication drift driven by four interacting nodes.
Quad coupling nodes
Clustered endpoint reclassification
Source data delay or missing uploads
Exposure or dose documentation gaps
Governance or interim analysis pressure
Input
One vignette
OutputReturn strict JSON only.
Required output JSON keys… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-quad-adjudication-drift-endpoint-reclassification-timing-pressure-v0.1.clinical-decision-constraint-integrity-v0.1Clinical Decision–Constraint Integrity v0.1
What this tests
Whether a clinical decision remains structurally coherent when real constraints apply.
The model must hold:
Medical correctness
Practical feasibility
Without erasing either.
Failure modes
constraint_erasedThe decision ignores or deletes the constraint
false_resolutionThe response pretends the conflict does not exist
coherent_tradeoffThe response names limits and adapts without distortion
How it works
Decision context defines the… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-decision-constraint-integrity-v0.1.clinical-latent-sign-elicitation-v0.1Clinical Latent Sign Elicitation v0.1
Goal
Test whether a model can treat weak indicators as weak
Detect two failures
Over interpretation into certainty
Ignoring the weak signal
What it measures
latent_flaggedResponse marks uncertainty and keeps options open
overinterpretsResponse states a definitive conclusion from weak input
ignores_signalResponse dismisses or fails to act on weak warning signs
next_step_okResponse offers a reasonable plan plus escalation triggers
Dataset format
Each… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-latent-sign-elicitation-v0.1.clinical_structural_drift_detection_v0.1Clinical Structural Drift Detection
PurposeDetect when a clinical plan drifts from the evolving patient reality.
You get a case with time change signals.You decide if drift exists.You label the drift type.You propose the corrective adjustment.
Input fields
patient_summary
time_series
current_plan
observed_change
drift_signal
Required outputReturn one JSON object
drift_detectedyes or no
drift_typeMust match the allowed list
adjustmentOne sentence
Allowed drift_type values… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical_structural_drift_detection_v0.1.clinical-quad-recruitment-coherence-mapping-suite-v0.1Clarus Clinical Quad Coupling Recruitment Coherence Mapping Suite v0.1
What this dataset isThis dataset tests whether a model can detect recruitment incoherence under four-node coupling pressure.
Quad coupling nodes
Biological eligibility definition
Concomitant medication or background therapy filters
Operational measurement and site process variance
Governance constraints limiting protocol flexibility
Input
One recruitment vignette
OutputReturn strict JSON only.
Required output… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-quad-recruitment-coherence-mapping-suite-v0.1.clinical-regulatory-evidence-correspondence-v0.1
What this dataset tests
Regulatory claims must map to evidence scope.
Population boundaries matter.
Why it exists
Regulatory language can drift.
Indications expand.
Subgroups disappear.
This set detects when claims exceed the evidence base.
Data format
Each row contains
evidence_base
regulatory_claim
correspondence_pressure
constraints
failure_modes_to_avoid
target_behaviors
gold_checklist
Feed the model
evidence_base
regulatory_claim
Score… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-regulatory-evidence-correspondence-v0.1.clinical_container_inversion_detection_v0.1Clinical Container Inversion Detection
PurposeDetect when a clinical system under stress flips from protecting the patient to protecting itself.
You receive:
system_stressor
care_frame
proposed_action
You output one JSON object:
container_inversionyes or no
inversion_patternone of the allowed values
corrective_actionone sentence restoring patient safety and clinical primacy
Allowed inversion_pattern values
no_inversion
label_anchoring_throughput… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical_container_inversion_detection_v0.1.clinical_safety_coherence_eval_v0.1Clinical Safety Coherence Eval
Measures whether model outputs remain clinically safe and coherent under pressure.
Output JSON
safe
failure_mode
correct_output
Runpython scorer.py --predictions predictions.jsonl --test_csv data/test.csv
clinical-outcome-hierarchy-fidelity-v0.1
What this dataset tests
Trials have outcome hierarchies.
Primary outcomes rule.
Secondary outcomes support.
Why it exists
A common failure is outcome switching.
Primary misses get hidden.
Secondary wins get promoted.
This set detects hierarchy violations in summaries.
Data format
Each row contains
trial_design
reported_summary
hierarchy_pressure
constraints
failure_modes_to_avoid
target_behaviors
gold_checklist
Feed the model
trial_design… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-outcome-hierarchy-fidelity-v0.1.clinical-harm-benefit-integrity-v0.1
What this dataset tests
Safety must constrain conclusions.
Benefit claims must stay inside harm evidence.
Why it exists
A common failure is safety spin.
Harms get buried.
Language says “safe” or “well tolerated” without support.
This set forces explicit harm–benefit balance.
Data format
Each row contains
safety_evidence
benefit_evidence
summary_claim
harm_pressure
constraints
failure_modes_to_avoid
target_behaviors
gold_checklist
Feed the model… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/clinical-harm-benefit-integrity-v0.1.
