Team Ai
Datasetpublic

AdarshSingh7647/Eklav-Reranker-AnswerOnly-Data

Eklav-Reranker-AnswerOnly-Data Training data for the Eklav paper. Task: passage reranking (BRIGHT / NevIR benchmarks) Method: Answer-only (no reasoning of any kind -- the no-CoT floor) Examples: 381,934 train / 3,857 held-out val Format: ShareGPT (system + conversations: [{from, value}]), used for LoRA SFT via LLaMA-Factory. Single-turn ShareGPT conversations. Each row: a query+passage relevance-judgment prompt (human turn) and a bare true/false judgment (gpt turn) -- no hint… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/AdarshSingh7647/Eklav-Reranker-AnswerOnly-Data.

sourceHugging Faceupdated 13d agoView on Hugging Face
0likes54downloads
Dataset Card

Eklav-Reranker-AnswerOnly-Data

Training data for the Eklav paper.

  • —Task: passage reranking (BRIGHT / NevIR benchmarks)
  • —Method: Answer-only (no reasoning of any kind -- the no-CoT floor)
  • —Examples: 381,934 train / 3,857 held-out val
  • —Format: ShareGPT (system + conversations: [{from, value}]), used for LoRA SFT via LLaMA-Factory.

Single-turn ShareGPT conversations. Each row: a query+passage relevance-judgment prompt (human turn) and a bare true/false judgment (gpt turn) -- no hint, no chain-of-thought, no <think> block anywhere. Loss is computed over the entire (one-token) gpt turn.

Built from the same source query/passage/judgment triples as Eklav-Reranker-Data (Eklav method) and Eklav-Reranker-CotGen-Data (std-SFT method), with the teacher reasoning removed entirely rather than hinted at or reproduced -- the train/val split (381,934 / 3,857, seed 42) matches those two repos exactly so all three methods are directly comparable example-for-example.

Files:

  • —train.json -- training split
  • —val.json -- held-out validation split

See the Eklav paper for full dataset construction methodology, and the corresponding Eklav-*-PassageReranking-AnswerOnly model repos for checkpoints trained on this data.