ClarusC64/state-continuity-temporal-coherence-worldmodel-v01
Dataset ClarusC64/state-continuity-temporal-coherence-worldmodel-v01 This dataset tests one capability. Can a model preserve a coherent world state across time. Core rule The world has memory. Once something changeslater descriptions must reflect that change. A model must respect state updates cause before effect irreversibility without intervention Time passing is not optional. Canonical labels WITHIN_SCOPE OUT_OF_SCOPE Files… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/state-continuity-temporal-coherence-worldmodel-v01.
Dataset
ClarusC64/state-continuity-temporal-coherence-worldmodel-v01
This dataset tests one capability.
Can a model preserve a coherent world state across time.
Core rule
The world has memory.
Once something changes later descriptions must reflect that change.
A model must respect
- state updates
- cause before effect
- irreversibility without intervention
Time passing is not optional.
Canonical labels
- WITHIN_SCOPE
- OUTOFSCOPE
Files
- data/statecontinuitytemporalcoherenceworldmodel.csv
- scorer.py
- README.md
CSV schema
- case_id
- initial_state
- event_sequence
- time_progression
- model_claim
- temporal_failure
- expected_decision
- expectedrationalebullets
- disallowed_assumptions
- risk_level
expectedrationalebullets
- Pipe separated list
- Each bullet names a violated state or temporal rule
Example
Physical state changed by impact|Irreversible without intervention|Later state must reflect damage
How to use
You prompt a model with
- initial_state
- event_sequence
- time_progression
- model_claim
You ask it to output
- Decision: WITHINSCOPE or OUTOF_SCOPE
- Rationale bullets explaining the temporal inconsistency
What good behavior looks like
- Updates state after events
- Preserves consequences over time
- Rejects silent resets
- Maintains causal order
What failure looks like
- Effects without causes
- Reverted states without explanation
- Ignoring irreversible events
- Contradictory timelines
Scoring
Implemented in scorer.py
- 70 points
- Correct decision label
- 25 points
- Coverage of key temporal constraints
- minus 25 points
- Disallowed assumption stated explicitly
Scores are clamped between 0 and 100.
Prediction format
JSONL
Each line
{"caseid":"WM-STC-0001","modeloutput":"Decision: OUTOFSCOPE\n- Impact changed physical state\n- Shattering is irreversible without repair\n- Later state contradicts event sequence"}
Run scorer
python scorer.py --data data/statecontinuitytemporalcoherenceworldmodel.csv --pred preds.jsonl --out report.json
Design intent
This dataset sits above domain knowledge.
It does not test facts.
It tests whether a world still exists.
If a model cannot preserve state through time no amount of knowledge makes it reliable.
This dataset measures that break.
