ClaudiaRichard/mbti_classification_dataset_fullPosts
MBTI Classification Dataset (Full Posts) A dataset of 8,675 personality-forum posts labeled with Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) dichotomies, built for training and evaluating text-based personality classification models. Each row contains one user's concatenated forum posts plus binary labels for all four MBTI dimensions. Dataset Structure Splits: train (5,205 rows), test (2,082 rows), validation (1,388 rows) Fields: Field Type Description I/E int64… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClaudiaRichard/mbti_classification_dataset_fullPosts.
MBTI Classification Dataset (Full Posts)
A dataset of 8,675 personality-forum posts labeled with Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) dichotomies, built for training and evaluating text-based personality classification models. Each row contains one user's concatenated forum posts plus binary labels for all four MBTI dimensions.
Dataset Structure
Splits: train (5,205 rows), test (2,082 rows), validation (1,388 rows)
Fields:
Source and Collection
Posts were collected from a public personality-discussion forum, where users self-report their MBTI type. Each user's posts were concatenated into a single text field (separated by |||), giving models a fuller picture of each author's writing style than single-post samples.
Intended Uses
- Training text classifiers that predict MBTI dimensions from writing
- Benchmarking fine-tuned language models (e.g. BERT) on personality classification
- Interpretability research on what linguistic signals models associate with personality traits
Considerations and Limitations
- Labels are self-reported. MBTI types were declared by the users themselves, not professionally assessed, so label noise is expected.
- Forum-specific language. Posts come from a personality-enthusiast community; the vocabulary (type jargon, memes) may not transfer to general text.
- Class imbalance. Some MBTI types (notably intuitive types) are overrepresented relative to the general population, as is typical of personality forums.
- MBTI validity. The MBTI framework itself is debated in psychology; treat this as a text-style classification task rather than a clinical instrument.
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite:
@misc{richard2024mbti,
author = {Richard, Claudia Lois},
title = {{MBTI} Classification Dataset (Full Posts)},
year = {2024},
publisher = {Hugging Face},
doi = {10.57967/hf/10813},
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClaudiaRichard/mbti_classification_dataset_fullPosts}}
}