Mohaaxa/quantbench-leaderboard-data
QuantBench leaderboard data Raw benchmark data behind the QuantBench leaderboard: calibration-quality GPTQ/AWQ quantization results across model sizes, calibration corpora, and GPU tiers. 331 rows (239 ok / 92 failed — failed runs are published too; a documented failure is a finding, not noise). Models Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct (1.5B) HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct (1.7B) deepgrove/Bonsai (0.5B) Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct (3B) — licence pending, rows only, no… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Mohaaxa/quantbench-leaderboard-data.
QuantBench leaderboard data
Raw benchmark data behind the QuantBench leaderboard: calibration-quality GPTQ/AWQ quantization results across model sizes, calibration corpora, and GPU tiers. 331 rows (239 ok / 92 failed — failed runs are published too; a documented failure is a finding, not noise).
Models
Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct(1.5B)HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct(1.7B)deepgrove/Bonsai(0.5B)Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct(3B) — licence pending, rows only, no weights hereHuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B(3B)
Files
rows.csv— the full table (see the leaderboard site for column definitions and the methodology page for the eval protocol).rows.parquet— the same table with an explicit Arrow schema (numeric columns nullable int64/double, blanks as null; everything else string). This is what the dataset viewer reads (configs:above);rows.csvis unchanged for humans.<row_id>.json— one file per row, same fields as itsrows.csvline.niche_rows.csv— task-level niche columns over the same artifacts (HumanEval[0:50] pass@1, FiQA-2018 sentiment accuracy [flare-finqa is gated for this token — instrument recorded per row], SEC-filing context drift, 10-prompt ROUGE-L consistency), each vs a same-stack fp16 baseline; failures/skips recorded as rows.logs/— the driver log, last heartbeat, and spend ledger from the run that produced this data (transparency, not polish — these are raw operational logs).pools/BUILD.md— exact recipe to reproduce the calibration/eval text pools. No third-party corpus text is redistributed here.
Honesty notes carried into every row
- GPTQ rows in this sweep ran gptqmodel's torch-fallback kernel path (
load_backendcolumn), not the optimized kernel — perplexity is unaffected, throughput numbers understate what a working kernel would show. - fp16 baselines are per-stack (autoawq vs gptqmodel use different torch/transformers pins), so
ppl_delta_vs_fp16is only comparable within one stack and one GPU tier, never across them. webgpu_runnableis[UNVERIFIED]on every row — no browser measurement was run.- Machine-generated benchmark output. Independent verification welcome; treat any single row as a data point, not a certified result.
